As such, during her latest sit-down interview with fellow content creator and reality star Gogo Skhotheni, Cyan got real when sharing her feelings about DJ Maphorisa and the recent drama he faced with his girlfriend Thuli Phongolo.
“A re tlapana, relokise” - Cyan on Maphorisa and Thuli P drama
It seems that one of the first producer-DJs that Cyan Boujee was linked with was none other than DJ Maphorisa back in 2018. Therefore, Gogo Skhotheni during Cyan’s episode on her The Venting Podcast was able to finally ask the question on whether or not they actually did date.
Cyan addressed the matter by rubbishing allegations that they were dating by sharing that:
“Nah, unfortunately we didn’t date… He liked me- But I like him now. So that’s the plot twist…”
Following this remark, Cyan reverted back to her flippant self as she then addressed the recent scandal that Maphorisa and his girlfriend Thuli P faced. As reported:
According to the City Press, the Thuli Phongolo and DJ Maphorisa got into an argument that resulted in Phongolo being allegedly assaulted by DJ Maphorisa. Reportedly, the incident of their assault was revealed By Phongolo's statement that she filed at the Sandton Police Station.
In light of the drama which has since ended with Thuli P withdrawing the charges and later coming to Maphorisa’s defence on social media with the contentious joint statement. Cyan shared her two cents by stating how she would handle the situation:
“You know with the Thuli P situation? I feel like if it was with me, a re tlapana, relokise (Translated from SeSotho: Let’s fight and fix it privately). LIke something, re saya mapodiseng (Let’s not involve the SAPS). Re lokise fast, nou di-courto, huh (Not us involving the courts, we fix the matter privately and quick).”
Fast Forward to 17:02 for the full excerpt:
Youtube embed
Let us that Cyan won’t find herself needing to consult legal advice following the joint statement by the couple which threatened legal action against those that continue to bring the matter into public discourse. As reported:
"Both parties have noted with concern, the disparaging, defamatory and (in some instances) untrue remarks, statements and reports emanating from the incident and view these in a serious light. The parties reserve their rights to individually pursue legal action against people making defamatory and/or false statements in relation to this matter.”
